Boss’s Guide To Employee Negotiation

Business leaders today report feeling that they must continually barter to extract complicated agreements from people with power over industries or individual careers. Sensing that theyre in incessant danger makes them need to act fast, project control ( even if they dont have any ), depend on duress, and defuse strain at any cost. The end result might be a compromise that fails to address the genuine problem or opportunity, heightened resistance from the opposite side that makes agreement impossible, acrimony that sours future negotiations, a failure to develop relations based on mutual respect and trust, or an understanding that creates great exposure to future risk. To avoid these dangers, executives can apply the same strategies utilised by well-trained army officials in hot spots like Afghanistan and Iraq. Those in extremist negotiators solicit others points of view, propose multiple solutions and invite their counterparts to critique them, use facts and principles of fairness to encourage the other side, systematically build trust and commitments over the course of time and take action to reshape the negotiation process as well as the result.

Get The giant Picture
Avoid
Presuming you have all the facts : look, its obvious that. assuming the other side is biased but you are no assuming the other sides inducements and aspirations are obvious and likely nefarious
Instead
Be curious : help me know how you see the situation. Be humble : what do I have wrong? Be open-minded : Is there an alternative way to clarify this?

uncover and cooperate
Avoid
Making open-ended offers : What do you want? Making one sided offers : Id be willing to. simply agreeing to ( or refusing ) the other sides demands
Instead
Ask Why is that crucial to you? propose solutions for critique : heres a possibilitywhat might be wrong with it?

arouse genuine Agreement
Avoid
Threats : youd better agree, or else. arbitrariness : I need it because I desire it. Close-mindedness : under no circumstances will I agree toor even considerthat proposal.
Instead
Appeal to fairness : What should we do? Appeal to logic and legitimacy : I believe this makes sense, because. Consider constituent points of view : how can everybody explain this agreement to colleagues?

build up trust First
Avoid
endeavoring to purchase a satisfactory relationship Offering concessions to mend breaches of trust, whether real or only understood
Instead
Explore how a breakdown in trust might have occurred and the way to remedy it. Make concessions only if they are a legit way to compensate for losses due to your nonperformance or broken commitments. Treat counterparts with respect, and act in ways which will command theirs.

concentrate on Process
Avoid
Acting without gauging how your actions will be understood and what the response will be ignoring the effects of a given action for future as well as current negotiations
Instead
Talk not only about the issues but about the negotiation process : We appear to be at an impasse ; perhaps we should spend some more time exploring our specific objectives and constraints. slow down the pace : Im not prepared to agree, but Id prefer not to walk away either. I suspect this warrants further exploration. Issue warnings without making threats : Unless you are willing to work with me toward a mutually sufficient outcome, I cant afford to spend more time negotiating.

About the Author

To learn more about written communication and how to
do a presentation check out the How To Speak and Write website.

Posted in Management skills